Peace yes, NATO no! - Focal points of the new NATO strategy
| Activities - Press Releases | 
Focal points of the  new NATO strategy  
 to be considered and adopted at the  NATO summit in Lisbon, 19-21 November 2010. 
 
 1. NATO insists on nuclear weapons as  absolute necessity for the politics of deterrence. Nuclear weapons are to be  continuously deployed and modernized, the British Trident Fleet Ballistic  Missiles as well as the American strategic nuclear weapons. All plans  concerning the withdrawal of nuclear weapons from Europe and the abandonment of  nuclear sharing are cancelled.
 
 2. The essence of the new NATO doctrine is the takeover of US plans concerning  an American missile defense as a central NATO project. Europe is to be  protected by an antiballistic missile defense shield. This is said to be the  only way to realize the concept of deterrence and security in the 21st century.
 
 3. The war in Afghanistan is seen as the topical challenge of NATO and shall be  continued with reinforced efforts of civil-military cross-linkages until the  war is won.
 
 4. All member states are asked to intensify their defense mechanisms and to  render them more effective.
 
 5. Although NATO does not perceive itself to police the world, it does  understand itself as an interventional force if its member states’ “interests”  (worldwide, but particularly within the European-Asian area) are endangered.  These interests explicitly include the protection of the member states’ “natural  resources” and trade routes.
 
 6. Another aim is the Eastern expansion of NATO – yet not as distinctly phrased  as in previous official documents. The Eastern expansion shall include new  partnership alliances with the former Southern Soviet republics as well as  Indonesia and Malaysia, and also Australia and New Zealand. Japan is to be  integrated in an innovative partnership.
 
 7. According to the new strategy paper, EU-Europe is seen as partner and second  pillar of NATO with a military alliance of its own, with which a “burden  sharing”, a division of tasks and duties, is envisaged. This involves a  significant revaluation of the EU military and defense policy as laid down in  the Lisbon Treaty.
 
 8. The need to reinforce electronical warfare is emphasized, regarding both  NATO’s own action and recruitment realm and the scope of response to attacks  directed at computers, communications- and power networks. The so-called “cyber  war” usually includes the depletion of democratic civil rights and a further  militarization of research (as regards security related topics).
 
 9. Furthermore, the strategy paper highlights the “new” role of NATO, which  shall manifest itself inter alia in the fight against global warming and other  global challenges. The “security” against the consequences of climate change  (migration flows) is to be ensured militarily.
 
 10. All these challenges are classified as part of the “war against terrorism”.  This war is among other things exploited for the feigned legitimation of global  interventional operations of NATO.
| < Prev | Next > | 
|---|
| Overstatement from Davos 2017. | 
| Liberal corporative capitalism, for reasons of lowering traveling costs, proposed not to travel to history alone but packed togather with NATO, EU and unipollar World Order. Workers participation has good chances to step in provisionally, buying time for full scale workers selfmanagment. | 











